2017 Dynastar Cham 2.0 W 107
0

Ski Stats

Sidecut 137/107/122
Radius 16m @ 174cm
Lengths 157,165,174,183
Weight 2010g @ 174cm
MSRP $800
3
0
0
[The test results and review for the Cham 2.0 W 107 are from 2016; its only changes for 2017 are cosmetic.] Any women’s ski with a 107cm waist is a lot of timber underneath a not-so-heavy load. When the women’s ski is a virtual clone of the men’s model, as is the case with the […]

[The test results and review for the Cham 2.0 W 107 are from 2016; its only changes for 2017 are cosmetic.]

Any women’s ski with a 107cm waist is a lot of timber underneath a not-so-heavy load. When the women’s ski is a virtual clone of the men’s model, as is the case with the Cham W 2.0 107, it’s essential the chassis it’s copying isn’t built like a locomotive. Dynastar realized a year ago that its widest Chams didn’t need Titanal laminates to hold their own in the daily battle against choppy, 3D snow, so they put down the pioneer Cham 107 and coronated their High Mountain version as the king of the category. All that was left was to apply a “W” to the shorter lengths, and voilà, instant Cham 2.0 W 107.   The new baseline and forebody shape represent, in the words of Galena Gleason, who has tested every Cham in Christendom since the dawn of Cham 1.0, “great improvements.”

Women’s Test Data Advisory

Please be advised that our 2022 women’s ski reviews do not show any test data, on either our public or members’ sites. Due to circumstances beyond our control, we haven’t been able to collect sufficient test results to justify showing a statistical summary.

While Realskiers members won’t be able to see stats on women’s reviews, they will see a longer, more in-depth narrative than what’s posted on our public site.

We appreciate your continued support through these troublesome times.