by Jackson Hogen | Sep 3, 2024
Realskiers hasn’t reviewed a Technical ski for a few seasons, a reflection of the category’s general invisibility on the American market. I’d love for this to be a review of Atomic’s Redster X9S, an exceptional roadster that feels like you’re driving a low-slung sports car with a racing suspension. But precious few retailers stock them, and as goes the U.S. retailer community, so goes the country’s demo fleets.
I provide this prelude because while the Redster Q9.8 is worthy of your consideration – for reasons I will shortly present – it isn’t the ultimate expression of Atomic’s capabilities. If you don’t just ski groomers but attack them, you’ll like the way the narrower Redster X9S can cut a short turn with the sudden ferocity of a race slalom, but it’s Multi-Radius Sidecut allows the skier to mix in a liquid GS arc at will. Stability is assured in turns of all sizes by Atomic’s signature shock-absorption tech, Revoshock S, which uses floating steel plates arrayed along the forebody to keep the Redster X9S pinned to the slope.
The Q9.8 headlines a family of Redster spin-offs that adapt the Redster’s race-oriented tech to make it more suitable for occasional forays off-piste. The Redster Q9.8 is substantially wider (84.5mm underfoot @ 173cm) than the 65.5mm-waisted Redster X9S, but it retains a very tidy 14.4m sidecut radius. The Redster Q9.8 is assuredly more tolerant of off-trail conditions than the purebred racers, but it shouldn’t be mistaken for an all-mountain model. Once crispy corduroy is converted to sodden slush piles, the Redster Q9.8 is out of its element.
by Jackson Hogen | Sep 3, 2024
Depending on where and how you ski, the Maverick 88 Ti may be the best of the top 4 models in the current all-mountain series from Atomic, despite residing on the lowest rung of the pricing ladder. It arcs the best short-radius turns of the bunch despite a mid-radius sidecut that’s equally comfortable when allowed to run for the barn. Its tail is supportive without being flashy, gradually releasing its grip as it crosses the turn transition.
As the narrowest of the Maverick Ti quartet, the 88 Ti is the best fit for today’s arrhythmic bumps, and its ability to access a short arc in a jiffy is a huge asset in the trees. When I let it run on a long, gradual ballroom on the sunny side of Mt. Rose, it remained predictable and trustworthy as I raked up the edge angle, banking off a receptive layer of solar-softened cream. Its baseline is more cambered than its siblings (15/75/10), so there’s a longer platform under the pilot in all conditions, without sacrificing its ability to swivel a turn in a pinch.
The Maverick 88 Ti has a little brother that’s at least worth considering, particularly if one’s ski budget is no fatter than a race ski’s waist. The Maverick 86 C doesn’t have the security on edge of the 88 Ti, but it has most of its other properties. For skiers whose off-trail skills are sketchy, the 86 C provides a bridge to proficiency. It’s probably the best bump ski of all the Mavericks, no kidding, and it’s a confidence-builder in all other conditions save those no intermediate wants to ski anyway. And it will sell for $549.95, making it one of the best values in the 24/25 market.
by Jackson Hogen | Sep 3, 2024
Lest there be any confusion, the Atomic Maverick 86 C didn’t crack our Recommended ranks because it’s a great ski. It earned our appreciation because it’s a remarkably good deal at its target retail of $549.95, a price plateau mostly populated by dreck. Atomic has made a habit out of making a superior carbon ski with an 86mm footprint, going back to its first Vantage series. The Maverick 86 C continues in this grand tradition.
I learned more about the Maverick 86 C’s capabilities than I intended to when I stepped into a pair during a Peter Glenn demo event at Palisades Tahoe. I was just in time to join a group taking an end-to-end mountain tour led by Jonny Moseley. Moseley and I were already well acquainted, going back to the days when I recruited him to ski for Head. I wasn’t going to miss the chance to spend some time with Jonny, no matter what skis were on my feet.
So, off I went on an excursion that included more than the usual dose of moguls, for obvious reasons. I was gob smacked by how well the doughty little (176cm) Maverick could snake through bumps, its loosely connected tips smoothly sliding over the tops and soft flex helping it slither through troughs. When it was time to gallop back to the lift, the tail was supportive enough to be stable within the normal recreational speed range.
by Jackson Hogen | Sep 3, 2024
The Atomic Bent Chetler 120 has been a headliner in the Powder genre for over 15 years, and like any ski with that long a life span, it has evolved in order to survive. But it hasn’t changed its essential character, which is an uncanny naturalness for a ski this massive. Its shape alone would give it the same flotation as an aircraft carrier, yet it doesn’t feel ponderous; quite the contrary, in fact. Certainly, part of the reason the Bent Chetler 120 maneuvers as adroitly as a much narrower ski is the way the tip and tail are rockered on both axes, so the ski is predisposed to drift just where it might otherwise over-react or hang up.
Driving the modifications to the 2025 version of the BC 120 is Atomic’s rekindled commitment to lowering the environmental impact of ski production. The core has been re-engineered with more wood (poplar), less metal (Titanal), and less fiberglass and its noxious companion, resin. Even the decoration on the topsheet – a Chris Bentchetler original design, of course – uses recycled materials. Taken together, the changes result in a 13% reduction in CO2 equivalent emissions compared to the Bent Chetler 120 of two seasons ago. The changes to the BC 120 are part of a larger effort on Atomic’s part to encourage collaboration across all brands to improve the industry’s performance in reducing its environmental impact.
All these modifications to the BC 120’s make-up don’t compromise the ski’s flotation or drift-ability, as its sidecut dimensions, HRZN 3D curvature on the tip and tail, size splits and weight didn’t change, but the core re-design compromised some of the skis’ hard-snow attributes. It needs some loose snow under it to push against to stabilize its trajectory. This is hardly a crime, as the Chetler 120 was always intended as a pure Powder ski (waists > 113mm), and none of the core changes have diminished that essential aptitude. It remains one of the elite in a genre that is gradually shrinking as brands thin the ranks of their fattest skis.
by Jackson Hogen | Sep 3, 2024
It’s unlikely that Atomic management foresaw just how much its boot brand would come to depend on a modest line of recreational boots it launched some 15 years ago. Called Hawx, its unique feature was vent-like creases on both sides of the forefoot, perceived as a fit...